Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.121
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 68(3): 282-288, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38437182

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Varicocoele is commonly encountered in males with infertility. Studies have shown that varicocoele repair (surgery or embolisation) can improve the rate of subsequent pregnancy. In Australia, there have been no studies assessing the cost of varicocoele embolisation and current practice is based on international data. This study aimed to assess the cost of varicocoele embolisation and estimate the treatment cost per pregnancy. METHODS: Retrospective cost-outcome study of patients treated by embolisation between January 2018 and 2023. A bottom-up approach was used to calculate procedure costs whereas a top-down approach was used to calculate costs for all other patient services, including direct and indirect costs. To calculate cost per pregnancy, costs were adjusted according to existing published data on the rate of pregnancy after embolisation. RESULTS: Costing data from 18 patients were included, of median age 33.5 years (range 26-60) and median varicocoele grade 2.5 (range 1-3). All patients had unilateral treatment, most commonly via right internal jugular (16 patients, 89%) and using a 0.035″ system (17 patients, 94%). The median cost for the entire treatment including procedural, non-procedural, ward and peri-procedural costs was AUD$2208.10 (USD$1405 or EUR€1314), range AUD$1691-7051. The projected cost to the healthcare system per pregnancy was AUD$5387 (USD$3429 or EUR€3207). CONCLUSION: Total varicocoele embolisation cost and the cost per-pregnancy were lower than for both embolisation and surgical repair in existing international studies. Patients undergoing varicocoele treatment should have the option to access an interventional radiologist to realise the benefits of this low-cost pinhole procedure.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Varicocele , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Embolização Terapêutica/economia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Austrália , Varicocele/terapia , Varicocele/economia , Varicocele/diagnóstico por imagem , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício
2.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 49(1): 165-172, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36008216

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new surgical technique for the treatment of unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. Very little data is available on the costs of this treatment in France as there is currently no code for PIPAC in the French Common Classification of Medical Acts (CCAM). Our objective was to estimate the mean cost of hospitalization for PIPAC in two French public teaching hospitals. METHODS: The mean cost of hospitalization was estimated from the mean fixed-rate remuneration paid to the hospital and the mean additional costs of treatment paid by the hospital. At discharge a patient's hospitalization is classified into a diagnosis related group, which determines the fixed-rate remuneration paid to the hospital (obtained from the national hospitals database - PMSI). Costs of medical devices and drug treatments specific to PIPAC, not covered by the fixed-rate remuneration, were obtained from the hospital pharmacies. RESULTS: Between July 2016 and November 2021, 205 PIPAC procedures were performed on 79 patients (mean procedures per patient = 2.6). Mean operating room occupancy was 165 min. The mean fixed-rate remuneration received by the hospitals per PIPAC hospitalization was €4031. The actual mean cost per hospitalization was €6562 for a mean length-of-stay of 3.3 days. Thus, each PIPAC hospitalization cost the hospital €2531 on average. CONCLUSION: The current reimbursement of PIPAC treatment by the national health system is insufficient and represents only 61% of the real cost. The creation of a new fixed-rate remuneration for PIPAC taking into account this cost differential is necessary.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Neoplasias Peritoneais , Humanos , Aerossóis , Hospitalização/economia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/tratamento farmacológico , Custos e Análise de Custo , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Hospitais de Ensino/economia , França
3.
BMJ Open ; 12(8): e056405, 2022 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35914917

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the changes in costs associated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admissions in New Zealand (NZ) public hospitals over a 12-year period. DESIGN: A cost-burden study of ACS in NZ was conducted from the NZ healthcare system perspective. SETTING: Hospital admission costs were estimated using relevant diagnosis-related groups and their costs for publicly funded casemix hospitalisations, and applied to 190 364 patients with ACS admitted to NZ public hospitals between 2007 and 2018 identified from routine national hospital datasets. Trends in the costs of index ACS hospitalisation, hospital admissions costs, coronary revascularisation and all-cause mortality up to 1 year were evaluated. All costs were presented as 2019 NZ dollars. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Healthcare costs attributed to ACS admissions in NZ over time. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2018, there was a 42% decrease in costs attributed to ACS (NZ$7.7 million (M) to NZ$4.4 M per 100 000 per year), representing a decrease of NZ$298 827 per 100 000 population per year. Mean admission costs associated with each admission declined from NZ$18 411 in 2007 to NZ$16 898 over this period (p<0.001) after adjustment for key clinical and procedural characteristics. These reductions were against a background of increased use of coronary revascularisation (23.1% (2007) to 38.1% (2018)), declining ACS admissions (366-252 per 100 000 population) and an improvement in 1-year survival post-ACS. Nevertheless, the total ACS cost burden remained considerable at NZ$237 M in 2018. CONCLUSIONS: The economic cost of hospitalisations for ACS in NZ decreased considerably over time. Further studies are warranted to explore the association between reductions in ACS cost burden and changes in the management of ACS.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/economia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/tendências , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/tendências , Humanos , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Work ; 72(2): 511-527, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35527591

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Public hospital managers in Rio de Janeiro must deal with severe budget costs, which is the only source of income of public hospitals. In this sense, systematic supply chain risk management can contribute to identifying such risks, assessing their severity, and developing mitigating plans, or even revealing the lack of such plans. Private hospital networks must also map their risks since they are facing a diminishing of demand given that unemployment in Brazil, which is growing in the past years, generates an impossibility of affording private healthcare. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to investigate how supply chain risk management is being applied in healthcare supply chains from Rio de Janeiro - Brazil. This study considers supply chains located in the state of Rio de Janeiro. To accomplish this objective, we provide answers to two Research Questions: RQ1 - Is SCRM known as a concept among Rio de Janeiro healthcare supply chains? RQ2 - How are risk identification, risk assessment, and risk mitigation being implemented by companies from the healthcare supply chains in Rio de Janeiro - Brazil? METHOD: Our research design is based on four steps: i) Research design; ii) Case selection: iii) Data collection (11 cases selected); iv) Data analysis. RESULTS: The interviews revealed that SCRM is an entirely unknown concept among healthcare supply chains from Rio de Janeiro - Brazil. Managers have empirical knowledge of the risks, and they can identify the most hazardous risks and can come up with solutions to mitigate them, nevertheless, in many situations they do not have the authority or the manpower to implement the solutions, at most, managers implement local risk mitigation initiatives that do not consider the supply chains broader context. CONCLUSION: The healthcare organizations studied by this paper do not apply SCRM. They only apply local isolated solutions not considering a supply chain scope. This can become hazardous since isolated risk mitigation initiatives are often innocuous and have the potential to generate other risks.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Equipamentos e Provisões Hospitalares , Setor de Assistência à Saúde , Hospitais Públicos , Gestão de Riscos , Brasil , Custos e Análise de Custo , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Equipamentos e Provisões Hospitalares/economia , Equipamentos e Provisões Hospitalares/provisão & distribuição , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Hospitais Públicos/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Gestão de Riscos/economia
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(2): e2145685, 2022 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35119464

RESUMO

Importance: Hong Kong's internal resource allocation system for public inpatient care changed from a global budget system to one based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) in 2009 and returned to a global budget system in 2012. Changes in patient and hospital outcomes associated with moving from a DRG-based system to a global budget system for inpatient care have rarely been evaluated. Objective: To examine associations between the introduction and discontinuation of DRGs and changes in length of stay, volume of care, in-hospital mortality rates, and emergency readmission rates in the inpatient population in acute care hospitals overall, stratified by age group, and across 5 medical conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included data from patients aged 45 years or older who were hospitalized in public acute care settings in Hong Kong before the introduction (April 2006 to March 2009), during implementation (April 2009 to March 2012), and after discontinuation (April 2012 to November 2014) of the DRG scheme. Data analysis was conducted from January to June 2021. Exposures: Public hospitals transitioned from a global budget payment system to a DRG-based system in April 2009 and returned to a global budget system in April 2014. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the association of use of DRGs with patient-level length of stay, in-hospital mortality rate, 1-month emergency readmission rate, and population-level number of admissions per month. An interrupted time series design was used to estimate changes in the level and slope of outcome variables after introduction and discontinuation of DRGs, accounting for pretrends. Results: This study included 7 604 390 patient episodes. Overall, the mean (SD) age of patients was 68.97 (13.20) years, and 52.17% were male. The introduction of DRGs was associated with a 1.77% (95% CI, 1.23%-2.32%) decrease in the mean length of stay, a 2.90% (95% CI, 2.52%-3.28%) increase in the number of patients admitted, a 4.12% (95% CI, 1.89%-6.35%) reduction in in-hospital mortality, and a 2.37% (95% CI, 1.28%-3.46%) decrease in emergency readmissions. Discontinuation of the DRG scheme was associated with a 0.93% (95% CI, 0.42%-1.44%) increase in the mean length of stay and a 1.82% (95% CI, 1.47%-2.17%) reduction in the number of patients treated after adjusting for covariates; no statistically significant change was observed in in-hospital mortality (-0.14%; 95% CI, -2.29% to 2.01%) or emergency readmission rate (-0.29%; 95% CI, -1.30% to 0.71%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, the introduction of DRGs was associated with shorter lengths of stay and increased hospital volume, and discontinuation was associated with longer lengths of stay and decreased hospital volume. In-hospital mortality and emergency readmission rates did not significantly change after discontinuation of DRGs.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Alocação de Recursos/economia , Alocação de Recursos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hong Kong , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 22-27, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332746

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: For-profit (FP) trauma centers (TCs) charge more for trauma care than not-for-profit (NFP) centers. We sought to determine charges, length of stay (LOS), and complications associations with TC ownership status (FP, NFP, and government) for three diagnoses among patients with overall low injury severity. METHODS: Adult patients treated at TCs with an International Classification of Diseases-based injury severity score (ICISS) survival probability ≥ 0.85 were identified. Only those who with a principal diagnosis of femur, tibial or rib fractures were included. RESULTS: Total charges were significantly higher at FP centers than NFP and lower at government centers (89.6% and -12.8%, respectively). FP TCs had a 12.5% longer LOS and government TCs had a 20.4% longer LOS than NFP TCs. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting to FP TCs with mild/moderate femur, tibial, or rib fractures experienced higher charges and increased LOS compared with government or NFP centers. There was no difference in overall complication rates.


Assuntos
Fixação de Fratura/economia , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Propriedade/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Fixação de Fratura/efeitos adversos , Fixação de Fratura/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico , Fraturas Ósseas/economia , Programas Governamentais/economia , Programas Governamentais/estatística & dados numéricos , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Privados/economia , Hospitais Privados/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Centros de Traumatologia/economia , Centros de Traumatologia/organização & administração , Adulto Jovem
8.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 1507(1): 99-107, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34476819

RESUMO

Doctors' prescribing behaviors impact both medical expenses and health resources. This study aims to identify the significant determinants of prescribing behaviors of doctors, which could potentially provide theoretical evidence on how to improve prescribing decisions. A multistage, stratified, cluster, random sampling method was employed in this survey. Data were collected from Jiangsu and Shanxi provinces in China in 2018. A total of 444 doctors in public hospitals completed the self-administered questionnaires. A structural equation model based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) was adopted for analysis. On the basis of the TPB, we constructed a model of doctors' prescribing behaviors, which explained the subjective and objective reasons for irrational prescribing behavior. Behavioral attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control could positively influence the actual behaviors, of which subjective norms impact prescribing behaviors the most. Employing the TPB helped in identifying determinants of prescribing behaviors from a new perspective. More significant policy changes and government support are required to help improve appropriate prescribing behaviors and ultimately make better prescribing decisions. This study provided a deeper understanding of this complex issue and will inform the development of a theory and evidence-based intervention for future research.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Hospitais Públicos/tendências , Médicos/economia , Médicos/tendências , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , China/epidemiologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos/normas , Fatores Socioeconômicos
9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(12): e2138543, 2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34889943

RESUMO

Importance: Low-value services have limited or no benefit to patients. Rates of low-value service in public hospitals may vary by patient insurance status, given that there may be different financial incentives for treatment of privately insured patients. Objective: To assess the variation in rates of 5 low-value services performed in Australian public hospitals according to patient funding status (ie, private or public). Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed New South Wales public hospital data from January 2013 to June 2018. Patients included in the sample were over age 18 years and eligible to receive low-value services based on diagnoses and concomitant procedures. Data analysis was conducted from June to December 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital-specific rates of low-value knee arthroscopic debridement, vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, oophorectomy with hysterectomy, and laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation for chronic pelvic pain were measured. For each measure, rates within each public hospital were compared by patient funding status descriptively and using multilevel models. Results: A total of 219 862 inpatients were included in analysis from 58 public hospitals across the 5 measures. A total of 38 365 (22 904 [59.7%] women; 12 448 [32.4%] aged 71-80 years) were eligible for knee arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis; 2520 (1924 [76.3%] women; 662 [26.3%] aged 71-80 years), vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures; 162 285 (82 046 [50.6%] women; 28 255 [17.4%] aged 61-70 years), hyperbaric oxygen therapy; 15 916 (7126 [44.8%] aged 41-50 years), oophorectomy with hysterectomy; and 776 (327 [42.1%] aged 18-30 years), uterine nerve ablation for chronic pelvic pain. Overall rates of low-value services varied considerably between measures, with the lowest rate for hyperbaric oxygen therapy (0.3 procedures per 1000 inpatients [47 of 158 220 eligible inpatients]) and the highest for vertebroplasty (30.8 procedures per 1000 eligible patients [77 of 2501 eligible inpatients]). There was significant variation in rates between hospitals, with a few outlying hospitals (ie, <10), particularly for knee arthroscopy (range from 1.8 to 21.0 per 1000 eligible patients) and vertebroplasty (range from 13.1 to 70.4 per 1000 eligible patients), with higher numerical rates of low-value services among patients with private insurance than for those without. However, there was no association overall between patient insurance status and low-value services. Overall differences in rates among those with and without private insurance by individual procedure type were not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: There was significant variation in rates of low-value services in public hospitals. While there was no overall association between private insurance and rate of low-value services, private insurance may be associated with low-value service rates in some hospitals. Further exploration of factors specific to local hospitals and practices are needed to reduce this unnecessary care.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/economia , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados de Baixo Valor , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New South Wales , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
10.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0260127, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34843530

RESUMO

Sepsis, an important and preventable cause of death in the newborn, is associated with high out of pocket hospitalization costs for the parents/guardians. The government of Nepal's Free Newborn Care (FNC) service that covers hospitalization costs has set a maximum limit of Nepalese rupees (NPR) 8000 i.e. USD 73.5, the basis of which is unclear. We aimed to estimate the costs of treatment in neonates and young infants fulfilling clinical criteria for sepsis, defined as clinical severe infection (CSI) to identify determinants of increased cost. This study assessed costs for treatment of 206 infants 3-59 days old, enrolled in a clinical trial, and admitted to the Kanti Children's Hospital in Nepal through June 2017 to December 2018. Total costs were derived as the sum of direct costs for bed charges, investigations, and medicines and indirect costs calculated by using work time loss of parents. We estimated treatment costs for CSI, the proportion exceeding NPR 8000 and performed multivariable linear regression to identify determinants of high cost. Of the 206 infants, 138 (67%) were neonates (3-28 days). The median (IQR) direct costs for treatment of CSI in neonates and young infants (29-59 days) were USD 111.7 (69.8-155.5) and 65.17 (43.4-98.5) respectively. The direct costs exceeded NPR 8000 (USD 73.5) in 69% of neonates with CSI. Age <29 days, moderate malnutrition, presence of any sign of critical illness and documented treatment failure were found to be important determinants of high costs for treatment of CSI. According to this study, the average treatment cost for a newborn with CSI in a public tertiary level hospital is substantial. The maximum limit offered for free newborn care in public hospitals needs to be revised for better acceptance and successful implementation of the FNC service to avert catastrophic health expenditures in developing countries like Nepal. Trial Registration: CTRI/2017/02/007966 (Registered on: 27/02/2017).


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/economia , Honorários e Preços/estatística & dados numéricos , Governo , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/tendências , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Nepal , Sepse/economia
11.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0256267, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34403449

RESUMO

Local hospitals play a crucial role in the healthcare system. In this study, the efficiency of Polish county hospitals is assessed by considering characteristics of hospitals that may determine their performance, such as the form of ownership, size, and staff structure. The main goal was to analyze the effect of three possible determinants on efficiency: ownership, the presence of an Emergency Department, and the presence of an Intensive Care Unit. The study covered different subgroups of hospitals and different approaches of inputs and outputs. An input-oriented radial super-efficiency DEA model under variable returns to scale was used for the efficiency analysis, and then differences between distributions of efficient and inefficient units were evaluated using a Chi-square test. A Kruskal-Wallis test was also used to analyze differences in mean efficiency. Inefficiency scores were regressed with hospital characteristics to test for other determinants. These results did not confirm differences in efficiency concerning ownership. However, in some subgroups of hospitals, running an Emergency Department or an Intensive Care Unit had a significant effect. Tobit regression results provided additional insight into how an Emergency Department or Intensive Care Unit can affect efficiency. Both cases had an effect of increasing inefficiency, and the data suggested that the department/unit size plays an important role.


Assuntos
Eficiência Organizacional/economia , Hospitais de Condado/economia , Hospitais Privados/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/provisão & distribuição , Propriedade/estatística & dados numéricos , Polônia , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
12.
Gynecol Oncol ; 162(1): 12-17, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33941382

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare gynecologic oncology surgical treatment modifications and delays during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic between a publicly funded Canadian versus a privately funded American cancer center. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all planned gynecologic oncology surgeries at University Health Network (UHN) in Toronto, Canada and Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) in Boston, USA, between March 22,020 and July 302,020. Surgical treatment delays and modifications at both centers were compared to standard recommendations. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 450 surgical gynecologic oncology patients were included; 215 at UHN and 235 at BWH. There was a significant difference in median time from decision-to-treat to treatment (23 vs 15 days, p < 0.01) between UHN and BWH and a significant difference in treatment delays (32.56% vs 18.29%; p < 0.01) and modifications (8.37% vs 0.85%; p < 0.01), respectively. On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, race, treatment site and surgical priority status, treatment at UHN was an independent predictor of treatment modification (OR = 9.43,95% CI 1.81-49.05, p < 0.01). Treatment delays were higher at UHN (OR = 1.96,95% CI 1.14-3.36 p = 0.03) and for uterine disease (OR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.11-5.33, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: During the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic, gynecologic oncology patients treated at a publicly funded Canadian center were 9.43 times more likely to have a surgical treatment modification and 1.96 times more likely to have a surgical delay compared to an equal volume privately funded center in the United States.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Hospitais Privados/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Canadá/epidemiologia , Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Institutos de Câncer/normas , Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/diagnóstico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ginecologia/economia , Ginecologia/organização & administração , Ginecologia/normas , Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Privados/economia , Hospitais Privados/organização & administração , Hospitais Privados/normas , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Hospitais Públicos/organização & administração , Hospitais Públicos/normas , Humanos , Oncologia/economia , Oncologia/organização & administração , Oncologia/normas , Oncologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/economia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Centros de Atenção Terciária/normas , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Triagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
13.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251760, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33984051

RESUMO

Oral cancer has been recognized as a significant challenge to healthcare. In Malaysia, numerous patients frequently present with later stages of cancers to the highly subsidized public healthcare facilities. Such a trend contributes to a substantial social and economic burden. This study aims to determine the cost of treating oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) and oral cancer from a public healthcare provider's perspective. Medical records from two tertiary public hospitals were systematically abstracted to identify events and resources consumed retrospectively from August 2019 to January 2020. The cost accrued was used to estimate annual initial and maintenance costs via two different methods- inverse probability weighting (IPW) and unweighted average. A total of 86 OPMD and 148 oral cancer cases were included. The initial phase mean unadjusted cost was USD 2,861 (SD = 2,548) in OPMD and USD 38,762 (SD = 12,770) for the treatment of cancer. Further annual estimate of initial phase cost based on IPW method for OPMD, early and late-stage cancer was USD 3,561 (SD = 4,154), USD 32,530 (SD = 12,658) and USD 44,304 (SD = 16,240) respectively. Overall cost of late-stage cancer was significantly higher than early-stage by USD 11,740; 95% CI [6,853 to 16,695]; p< 0.001. Higher surgical care and personnel cost predominantly contributed to the larger expenditure. In contrast, no significant difference was identified between both cancer stages in the maintenance phase, USD 700; 95% CI [-1,142 to 2,541]; p = 0.457. A crude comparison of IPW estimate with unweighted average displayed a significant difference in the initial phase, with the latter being continuously higher across all groups. IPW method was shown to be able to use data more efficiently by adjusting cost according to survival and follow-up. While cost is not a primary consideration in treatment recommendations, our analysis demonstrates the potential economic benefit of investing in preventive medicine and early detection.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Neoplasias Bucais/terapia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/terapia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Incidência , Malásia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Boca/patologia , Neoplasias Bucais/economia , Neoplasias Bucais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Bucais/patologia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/economia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos
14.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0248518, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33788865

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Protecting people from financial hardship and impoverishment due to health care costs is one of the fundamental purposes of the Mongolian health system. However, the inefficient, oversized hospital sector is considered one of the main shortcomings of the system. The aim of this study is to contribute to policy discussions by estimating the extent of catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment due to inpatient care at secondary-level and tertiary-level public hospitals and private hospitals. METHODS: Data were derived from a nationally representative survey, the Household Socio-Economic Survey 2012, conducted by the National Statistical Office of Mongolia. A total of 12,685 households were involved in the study. "Catastrophic health expenditure" is defined as out-of-pocket payments for inpatient care that exceed a threshold of 40% of households' non-discretionary expenditure. The "impoverishment" effect of out-of-pocket payments for inpatient care was estimated as the difference between the poverty level before health care payments and the poverty level after these payments. RESULTS: At the threshold of 40% of capacity to pay, 0.31%, 0.07%, and 0.02% of Mongolian households suffered financially as a result of their member(s) staying in tertiary-level and secondary-level public hospitals and private hospitals respectively. About 0.13% of the total Mongolian population was impoverished owing to out-of-pocket payments for inpatient care at tertiary-level hospitals. Out-of-pocket payments for inpatient care at secondary-level hospitals and private hospitals were responsible for 0.10% and 0.09% respectively of the total population being pushed into poverty. CONCLUSIONS: Although most inpatient care at public hospitals is covered by the social health insurance benefit package, patients who utilized inpatient care at tertiary-level public hospitals were more likely to push their households into financial hardship and poverty than the inpatients at private hospitals. Improving the hospital sector's efficiency and financial protection for inpatients would be a crucial means of attaining universal health coverage in Mongolia.


Assuntos
Estresse Financeiro/economia , Estresse Financeiro/prevenção & controle , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Seguro Saúde/economia , Doença Catastrófica/economia , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Características da Família , Equidade em Saúde/economia , Hospitais Privados/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Humanos , Mongólia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde/economia
15.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(1)2021 Jan 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33431439

RESUMO

We describe a case of a middle-aged woman who presented with progressive jaundice and was suspected to have rebound choledocholithiasis, which was initially managed with balloon extraction through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at her first presentation. Healthcare in Pakistan, like many other developing countries, is divided into public and private sectors. The public sector is not always completely free of cost. Patients seeking specialised care in the public sector may find lengthy waiting times for an urgent procedure due to a struggling system and a lack of specialists and technical expertise. Families of many patients find themselves facing 'catastrophic healthcare expenditure', an economic global health quandary much ignored.


Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/economia , Coledocolitíase/terapia , Tratamento Conservador/economia , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Icterícia Obstrutiva/terapia , Coledocolitíase/complicações , Coledocolitíase/diagnóstico , Coledocolitíase/economia , Ducto Colédoco/diagnóstico por imagem , Ducto Colédoco/cirurgia , Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Mão de Obra em Saúde/economia , Hospitais Privados/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Humanos , Icterícia Obstrutiva/economia , Icterícia Obstrutiva/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paquistão , Cuidados Paliativos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tempo para o Tratamento/economia , Ultrassonografia
16.
Int J Equity Health ; 20(1): 12, 2021 01 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33407503

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since 2015, all pilot cities of public hospital reform in China have allowed the zero-markup drug policy and implemented the policy of Separating of Hospital Revenue from Drug Sales (SHRDS). The objective of this study is to evaluate whether SHRDS policy reduces the burden on patients, and to identify the mechanism through which SHRDS policy affects healthcare expenditure. METHODS: In this study, we use large sample data of urban employee's healthcare insurance in Chengdu, and adopt the difference in difference model (DID) to estimate the impact of the SHRDS policy on total healthcare expenditures and drug expenditure of patients, and to provide empirical evidence for deepening medical and health system reform in China. RESULTS: After the SHRDS policy's implementation, the total healthcare expenditure kept growing, but the growth rate slowed down between 2014 to 2015. The total healthcare expenditure of patients decreased by only 0.6%, the actual reimbursement expenditure of patients decreased by 4.1%, the reimbursement ratio decreased by 2.6%. and the drugs expenditure dropped by 14.4%. However, the examinations expenditure increased by 18.2%, material expenditure increased significantly by 38.5%, and nursing expenditure increased by 12.7%. CONCLUSIONS: After implementing the SHRDS policy, the significant reduction in drug expenditure led to more physicians inducing patients' healthcare service needs, and the increased social healthcare burden was partially transferred to the patients' personal economic burden through the decline in the reimbursement ratio. The SHRDS policy is not an effective way to control healthcare expenditure.


Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Médica/economia , Preparações Farmacêuticas/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , China , Feminino , Programas Governamentais/economia , Programas Governamentais/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Assistência Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
17.
Health Serv Res ; 56(1): 36-48, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32844435

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The California Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program (DSRIP) provided incentive payments to Designated Public Hospitals (DPHs) to improve quality of care. We assessed the program's impact on reductions in sepsis mortality, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), venous thromboembolisms (VTEs), and hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs). DATA SOURCES: We used 2009-2014 discharge data from California hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: We used a pre-post study design with a comparison group. We constructed propensity scores and used them to assign inverse probability weights according to their similarity to DPH discharges. Interaction term coefficients of time trends and treatment group provided significance testing. DATA EXTRACTION: We used Patient Safety Indicators for CLABSI, HAPU, and VTE, and constructed a sepsis mortality measure. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Discharges from DPHs and non-DPHs both saw decreases in the four outcomes over the DSRIP period (2010-2014). The difference-in-difference estimator (DD) for sepsis was only significant during two time periods, comparing 2010 with 2012 (DD: -2.90 percent, 95% CI: -5.08, -0.72 percent) and 2010 with 2014 (DD: -5.74, 95% CI: -8.76 percent, -2.72 percent); the DD estimator was not significant comparing 2010 with 2012 (DD: -1.30, 95% CI: -3.18 percent, 0.58 percent) or comparing 2010 with 2013 (DD: -3.05 percent, 95% CI: -6.50 percent, 0.40 percent). For CLABSI, we did not find any meaningful differences between DPHs and non-DPHs across the four time periods. For HAPU and VTE, the only significant DD estimator compared 2014 with 2010. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find that DPHs participating in DSRIP outperformed non-DPHs during the DSRIP program. Our results were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses. Given multiple concurrent inpatient safety initiatives, it was challenging to assign improvements over time periods to DSRIP.


Assuntos
Fortalecimento Institucional/economia , Economia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/organização & administração , Planos Governamentais de Saúde/organização & administração , California , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Estados Unidos
18.
J Asthma ; 58(2): 207-212, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31621441

RESUMO

Objective: To describe resource use and costs of severe exacerbations in patients with severe asthma.Method: Secondary analysis of an observational, longitudinal, retrospective study that estimated the economic impact of severe asthma. The study was carried out in severe asthma units of the pulmonology and allergy services of 20 public hospitals (inclusion period: June to November 2016). The study included adult patients diagnosed with severe asthma according to the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society consensus in the stable phase (no exacerbation during the last 2 months), and with at least one severe exacerbation during the study period (12 months). Healthcare resource use due to severe exacerbations (emergency visits, hospitalizations and pharmacological treatment) was recorded. The direct health costs associated with severe exacerbations were calculated by multiplying the resources used by the corresponding unit cost (in 2018 euros).Results: 134 patients with ≥1 severe exacerbation were included: 63% were female and the mean age was 54 years. 249 severe exacerbations were registered. There were 1.5 physician visits at primary care, hospital care and/or emergency room per episode, 13% of episodes required hospitalization, with a mean hospital stay of 7.2 days. Systemic corticosteroids were prescribed in 92% of exacerbations. The mean direct cost was €758.7/exacerbation (95% confidence interval: 556.8-1,011.1), of which 82% was due to hospitalizations (€623.3/episode). Considering only episodes requiring hospital admission, the mean cost increased by €4,997/exacerbation.Conclusions: It was estimated that the economic impact of a severe exacerbation in Spanish patients with severe asthma was €758.7/exacerbation.


Assuntos
Asma/economia , Asma/fisiopatologia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Corticosteroides/economia , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Índice de Massa Corporal , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Espanha
19.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 47(4): 828-833, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32972815

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cost-effective cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treatment of patients with peritoneal malignancy remains an ongoing financial challenge for healthcare systems, hospitals and patients. This study aims to describe the detailed in-hospital costs of CRS and HIPEC compared with an Australian Activity Based Funding (ABF) system, and to evaluate how the learning curve, disease entities and surgical outcomes influence in-hospital costs. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive costing review of all CRS and HIPEC cases undertaken at a large public tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia from April 2017 to June 2019. In-hospital cost variables included staff, critical care, diagnosis, operating theatre, and other costs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate the differences between actual cost and the provision of funding, and potential factors associated with these costs. RESULTS: Of the 118 CRS and HIPEC procedures included in the analyses, the median total cost was AU$130,804 (IQR: 105,744 to 153,972). Provision of funding via the ABF system was approximately one-third of the total CRS and HIPEC costs (p < 0.001). Surgical staff proficiency seems to reduce the total CRS and HIPEC costs. Surgical time, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay are the main predictors of total CRS and HIPEC costs. CONCLUSION: Delivery of CRS and HIPEC is expensive with high variability. A standard ABF system grossly underestimates the specific CRS and HIPEC funding required with supplementation essential to sustaining this complex highly specialised service.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/economia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/economia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Idoso , Austrália , Competência Clínica , Custos e Análise de Custo , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos/economia , Feminino , Financiamento Governamental/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Salas Cirúrgicas/economia , Duração da Cirurgia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 154(1): 49-55, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33275780

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Puerperal infection (PI) is a known maternal health problem globally. However, there is limited information on its economic impact on patients, carers, and public hospitals in lower-middle-income countries, such as Ghana. METHODS: A prospective case-control study was undertaken in two regional hospitals to analyze the cost of PI. A total of 667 and 559 participants were enrolled in the study at the Greater Accra Regional Hospital (GARH) and the Eastern Regional Hospital (ERH), respectively. Total, average and marginal costs were analyzed between patients with and without PI. RESULTS: Within the study period, the prevalence of PI was 9.1% at ERH and 14.9% at GARH. Overall, patients with PI reported excess length of hospital stay (LOS), corresponding to 46.8% and 33.5% increases in average direct cost at ERH and GARH, respectively, compared with their control groups. In almost all cases, the attributable indirect cost was consistent with productivity loss. CONCLUSION: In both hospitals, patients with PI reported excess LOS and increased direct and indirect costs. The total cost of PI to society, which is the sum of the direct cost, productivity loss, and hospital cost, was higher in Greater Accra than in the Eastern region.


Assuntos
Cuidadores , Custos Hospitalares , Infecção Puerperal/economia , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Gana , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA